Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bardsworth

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 03:03, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bardsworth

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Currently the page consist of pretty much exclusively plot detail and gives no references except for the comic itself and its creator. The general requirement for a stand alone article as stated in the general notability guideline is "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject". In this instance I cannot find any evidence that this comic has received any coverage from reliable, third party sources and per Wikipedia:Verifiability "If no reliable third-party sources can be found on a topic, Wikipedia should not have an article on it.". Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia, not an internet guide and third-party sources are necessary to give any article an appropriate critical and historical context. Guest9999 (talk) 18:59, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Webcomics-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:42, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:38, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete. G11 or A7 may be applicable. Appears to be a fan page. Article relies solely on primary source web site. No assertion of notability whatsoever. ~Amatulić (talk) 00:33, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.